Sunday, March 24, 2019

Thirsty?

Scriptures:        Isaiah 55:1-9                             Psalm 63:1-8
I Corinthians 10:1-6, 9-13          Luke 13:1-9



In the 1980’s, the Partnership for a Drug Free America ran an ad showing a rat in a metal cage . The rat hits a lever, and down drops a white pellet. With increasingly alarming music playing in the background, the rat begins to chew on it, and as the rat chews on the pellet, the rat becomes clumsy, stumbling around the cage.  The rat chews on it some more, becoming clumsier still, to the point where it can barely move.  But the rat continues to return to the pellet, chewing off more…..eventually dying.  The voiceover for the ad says, “There’s one drug that is so addicting that 9 out of 10 lab rats will keep using…and using….and using…. Until death.   It’s called cocaine, and it can do the same thing to you.” [1] Experiments were done with rats alone in cages, some equipped with plain water, some with water spiked with cocaine.  The rats with the spiked water returned to it over and over, until they were addicted, eventually until they died.[2]
This morning’s Old Testament reading comes from the portion of Isaiah that Biblical scholars call “the Book of Comfort” – this section runs from Isaiah 40 roughly to Isaiah 55.  The early chapters of Isaiah, chapters 1 through 39, were written to warn the Jews that God was greatly displeased with them, and that if they continued on their course, they would meet with destruction – as happened when Babylon overran Jerusalem, destroying the city and temple.  But starting with Isaiah chapter 40, the tone shifts.   This section was written at the end of the Jew’s exile in Babylon, when Cyrus the Persian had conquered Babylon, and issued his famous decree  allowing the Jews to return home to Jerusalem.  The people had been in exile in a foreign land for decades, with the institutions that supported their culture long destroyed.  Few of the Jews who had been exiled all those decades ago were still living, and their children had no memory of what Jerusalem and its temple had been, only stories passed down from their parents.  Would those hand-me-down stories be enough to motivate people to return home?
Isaiah is urging his listeners to trust God and return to Jerusalem, and so what does he offer them?  A sermon, warning that God will punish them again if they mess up as they had in the past?  A lecture, with an accusatory finger pointed at them, reminding them of the sins that had led to their exile?  No, Isaiah offers them – a banquet invitation!  ‘Ho, come to the water! You with no money come, buy and eat. Buy wine and milk, without money and without price!  Why spend hard-earned money on that which is not food and does not satisfy? Listen carefully to me at eat what is nourishing.  Come and eat fine food!”  Isaiah’s invitation is like food and drink to starving people – and not just any food, not blue plate special food, not baked goods and vegetables that are past their sell-by date, but fine wine and top-drawer food.  For us, halfway through Lent, when many people fast or give up favorite food items, it may be jarring to hear this passage in which God through Isaiah is not just inviting but commanding his people to chow down on filet mignon and wash it down with their finest beverage of choice.  What’s more, Isaiah promises that they will be living so high that the surrounding nations will come running to them.   At this point, the  Tom Petty fans among us may remember the words “You don’t have to live like a refugee.”  And that’s basically Isaiah’ message to those who were refugees in Babylon – you don’t have to live like this.  God’s got something better for you. Of course, Isaiah warns that the invitation will not be extended indefinitely, as he cries, “Seek the Lord while he may be found, call unto him while he is near.  Let the wicked turn from their ways and the unrighteous from their evil thoughts.”  But even Isaiah’s warning is given, not to condemn, but to invite them to end self-destructive behavior so that their own lives can be lived more fully.
Isaiah’s words of hope were written to a people in exile.  We have an example of what exile looks like in our own congregation.  Our member Isaac came here as a refugee from Liberia.  He lives here in exile.  Even though he has put down roots here, he has not forgotten his homeland; he is active with groups of exiled Liberians to influence policy in Liberia, so that life will be better, if not for him, at least for his children.  But there are other ways to be in exile, with barriers other than distance standing between us and the lives we would like to live.  Our homeless members and near-homeless members are in a kind of economic exile in their own country, unable because of poverty to live with a sense of security, unsure even where their next meal is coming from, without a safe place to lay their head.   Others may have more economic security, but because of social policies live with the knowledge that all that can be taken away at an instant.  For example, there are no federal laws protecting LGBTQ persons against discrimination in housing and employment, and protection against discrimination in Pennsylvania is spotty at best, with Philadelphia and some other large cities offering robust protections while more rural communities offer little or nothing. In August 2018, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission has interpreted existing law to afford more protection against discrimination, but what one administration enacts the next may strike down. LGBT persons live with the knowledge in the back of their minds of the grim reality that no matter how much security and comfort they may have at any present, the carpet could be pulled out from under them at any moment, that everything can be taken from them at the stroke of a pen.
Beyond these specific examples, many of us live with barriers between us and the lives we would like to be living.   Our employment and housing opportunities may be limited by bad references and bad credit ratings, by convictions and criminal records; our activities may be limited by health challenges; our sense of connectedness to others may be limited by broken relationships.  The pain caused by such barriers, such limitations, may lead us to make unhealthy choices – if not drugs or alcohol, we may turn to other pacifiers such as overeating or other forms of excessive consumption, or smoking, or gambling, or overwork – all substances or behaviors that we know are unhealthy, but that may distract us from the pain, at least in the moment. Isaiah called his listeners to turn from spending their money on that which is not food, on that which does not satisfy.  He told his listeners , “You don’t have to live like a refugee.”  Our reading from Isaiah reminds us that against all these limitations, God offers us, not a lecture, but an invitation to a better life, an invitation to turn away from isolation and turn toward life among God’s people, among the beloved community, where from the community’s resources we can feed and clothe and shelter, and educate and embrace and protect – and give our members a firm enough foundation, a place to stand on, so that they can turn away from unhealthy pacifiers and self-destructive behavior.
Earlier, I mentioned the experiments around rats and addiction, that a rat in a cage with access to cocaine will use it repeatedly and become addicted.  Bruce Alexander had done research in the 1970’s with rats and cocaine, but took his research in a different direction.  He realized that existing experiments involved rats – which are social animals - isolated in cold metal cages, with nothing but the addictive substance as a diversion.  He constructed what he called “rat park”, with everything a rat could want, with plentiful food, places to hide, and places to run, and places to gather, and put small groups of lab rats in his rat park.  Among other options for food and water, Alexander made water spiked with cocaine available to the lab rats…..but, he found, the rats just weren’t that interested.  Rat park offered enough other forms of stimulation and community that the spiked water just wasn’t all that enticing.   He then introduced addicted lab rats from earlier experiments into “rat park”…..and while they went through withdrawal, afterward they were able to join with the other rats, without recourse to the cocaine-spiked water.  Alexander’s conclusion was that addiction among his rats wasn’t an inevitable result of consuming cocaine, but a response to being isolated in a cage with no other forms of stimulation….more broadly, to isolation and miserable living conditions, with cocaine-spiked water as the only respite.  In looking back on those Rat Park experiments 40 years later, Alexander writes, “The view of addiction from Rat Park is that today’s flood of addiction is occurring because our hyperindividualistic, hypercompetitive, frantic, crisis-ridden society makes most people feel social[ly] and culturally isolated. Chronic isolation causes people to look for relief. They find temporary relief in addiction to drugs or any of a thousand other habits and pursuits because addiction allows them to escape from their feelings, to deaden their senses, and to experience an addictive lifestyle as a substitute for a full life.” .[3]  Of course, Alexander’s suggestion runs counter to US policy; after a 40 year war on drugs and 40  years of tough on crime policies, under administrations of both major political parties, we have more people isolated from society by means of incarceration - over 2 million – than any other country In the world, more than China whose population is roughly four times our population, far more than Russia.[4]  We have the highest rate of incarceration – roughly 650 per 100,000 population , or put another way roughly 2/3 of 1% of the population in prison at any given time – more than any other country – and after all that, we  have an epidemic of opioid abuse; our country is  so overflowing with drugs it’s practically dripping out of our eyeballs. The so-called war on drugs has left our country swamped with drugs. [Maybe we should declare a war on chocolate instead, so that we can be floating on a sea of chocolate instead of drowning in an ocean of opioids?]  While turning a blind eye to crime is no solution either, is it possible that rehabilitation with community support could more successfully bring healing both on an individual and a societal level?
In our Gospel reading, Jesus is discussing the events of the day with his listeners.  Pilate had some worshipers executed, and the crowd wanted to know if this was punishment from God because they had been especially sinful.  Jesus came back with an example of his own – a tower fell on some people, killing them – and asked the crowd if they were worse sinners than anyone else.  Jesus said no in both cases, that those executed by Pilate and those crushed by the tower were not worse sinners than anyone else – but that the crowd shouldn’t feel smug because they had been spared these calamities, that it was only by God’s grace that they were still standing, and that if they didn’t turn their lives around, death in one form or another awaited them as well.
He then told a story that we might call “the parable of the impatient landowner.”  The owner of a plot of land walked up to his gardener, pointed out a three-year-old fig tree that had borne no fruit, and demanded that it be cut down to make the ground available for other use.  The gardener pleaded with the landowner to give the tree one more year.  In preparing this sermon I learned that while many fig trees bear fruit after two years, some may take as long as six years to produce figs – it’s a matter of the fig tree’s own maturing process as well as the quality of the soil.  The gardener asked for one more year, and said that he’d give the tree some extra TLC – turning the soil, adding fertilizer in the form of manure.  The gardener wanted the tree to have the most favorable conditions possible to be productive.  And, he told the landowner, if that doesn’t work, next year you can cut the tree down. 
In response to an unproductive tree, the gardener offered, not punishment in the form of cutting down the tree, but grace, in the form of additional time and care.  This is actually what reminded me of what I had read some time ago about the Rat Park experiment, that isolation seemed to feed addiction, while the grace that the lab rats experienced in Rat Park seemed to lead them away from addiction.  Now, we can respond to grace either with gratitude or with entitlement, and Jesus recognized this when he told his listeners that the fact that they hadn’t experienced calamity wasn’t necessarily a reward for good behavior, but grace from God to which they should respond by repenting and changing the course of their lives.  In the same way, while proponents of the prosperity gospel tell us that good fortune is God’s reward for our faithfulness, Jesus is telling us that our good fortune may just be God’s grace given to us in hopes that our behavior will change.  At the same time, perhaps grace – not turning a blind eye to bad behavior, but engagement, education and rehabilitation - rather than punishment should be our response to disappointing behavior from others.
“Ho, all you who are thirsty, come to the waters,” Isaiah invited the Jewish exiles in Babylon….and invites all who are in exile from living life to the full.  “Why spend your money on that which does not satisfy?”, Isaiah asked the exiles – and asks us. “You don’t have to live like a refugee!” is the  message of our readings today.  May we turn from our addictions and pacifiers, and turn toward Jesus, who offers us living water and the bread of life.  And may we invite others to come to the waters, invite others to eat the bread of heaven, and feed until they want no more.  Amen.







[1] This can be seen on the Youtube video “Cocaine Rat – Drug Free America”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kS72J5Nlm8
[2] https://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-real-cause-of-addicti_b_6506936.html
[3] http://brucekalexander.com/articles-speeches/rat-park/148-addiction-the-view-from-rat-park
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate

Gathered

Genesis 15:1-12, 17-18
Psalm 27
Philippians 3:17–4:1
Luke 13:31-35



Today our Scripture readings seem to have a theme of trusting in God’s care and protection.  Aging Abram, assuming he would die childless, is told by God that God would make a great nation of him.  And Jesus, apprised of a threat from Herod, basically compares himself to a mother hen, frustrated that her chicks are running from her instead of gathering under her. 
Jesus is on his way to Jerusalem.  Just before today’s reading, he had healed a bent-over woman – and as often happened with Jesus, instead of being praised for the healing, he was condemned because he healed the woman in the wrong place at the wrong time – that is to say, in a synagogue on the Sabbath.  He told several parables about the reign of God, comparing it to a mustard seed, a tiny seed from which can grow a great shrub, and yeast, which though tiny can  with water transform flour into dough for bread.  He also said that the entrance to the kingdom is narrow, and that many who are first in this life will be last in the life to come, and many who are now last will be first.  And at this teaching moment, some Pharisees come to warn Jesus that Herod is on the hunt for him.
We may wonder about the motivations of these Pharisees.  Are they trying to protect Jesus, or to scare him off?  Or maybe both?  Was their warning an attempt to uphold or to undermine Herod’s authority?  Jesus’ relationship with the Pharisees is complicated.  There were similarities between Jesus and the Pharisees, in that both Jesus and the Pharisees thought that faith wasn’t just about weekly religious observance, but that it was important to practice faith every day in every part of one’s life.  But, as the Gospels portray the differences, the Pharisees were concerned about maintaining purity by upholding the ceremonial law, including guidelines on what food was acceptable, what clothing was acceptable, what choices of friends were acceptable, etc..  Jesus was not overly concerned with the finer points of the ceremonial law – he often hung out with those the Pharisees considered the scum of the earth - and more concerned about love of neighbor, and was willing to bend or even break the purity guidelines of the time in order to help people.  
Now, as we read the Gospels, we should keep in mind that their portrayals of the Pharisees isn’t by any means neutral or impartial – the Gospels were intentionally written to make Jesus look good, and in so doing sometimes make the Pharisees look not so good – and at the time they were written, decades after Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, the disciples of Jesus were being pushed out of the mainstream Judaism of the time, and it was like an ugly divorce, with accusations and counter-accusations being hurled on all sides.  We should remember that Jesus, his disciples, along with the Pharisees and the Sadducees, were all Jews…they just had differing visions on how to live out their Judaism.  We certainly shouldn’t view modern-day Jewish people as acting anything like the stereotypical Pharisees of the gospels.  I say all this because we live in a time where religious stereotyping and bigotry leads to violence, as at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh several months ago, and now this weekend at against Muslims at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand.  We should always be working to improve dialogue and understanding between faiths, and not to spread mistrust.  But, as I said, the Gospels portray Jesus’ relationship with the Pharisees as complicated, with some Pharisees condemning Jesus, some being at least willing to engage in dialogue with Jesus, and some at least partially agreeing with Jesus.  Maybe the Pharisees could be described as “frenemies”.   Right after today’s reading, Jesus is invited to dinner by a Pharisee…..but that’s a story for another time.
In any case, the Pharisees warn Jesus that Herod is out to get him.  Now, Herod is a dangerous, paranoid man, a real piece of work.  He not only had John the Baptist executed, he had his own son executed when he thought his son was a threat.  Jesus, however, seems distinctly unimpressed, and starts talking trash about Herod.  “Go tell that fox for me, “Listen, I am casting out demons and performing cures today and tomorrow, and on the third day I finish my work.”  Jesus calls Herod a fox – hardly the fearsome image of a roaring lion that Herod would likely have chosen for himself.  We might think of it as Jesus asking the Pharisees to tell Herod, “You don’t scare me.  I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing, and I’ll take whatever time is needed, and I’ll leave the area on my own schedule.  You’re not going to stampede me and my disciples out of town before I’m done.”  But then Jesus refers to his continuing journey toward Jerusalem with bitter irony, because Jesus knows what awaits him in Jerusalem.  “Yet today, tomorrow, and the next day I must be on my way, because it is impossible for a prophet to be killed outside of Jerusalem.' Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it!”
Jerusalem still occupies a paradoxical role.  The city holds a prominent place in three great faiths – Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.   Given that place of honor, you would think that Jerusalem would be the place where the best of these faiths would be evident, and that unconditional love and peace would prevail there.  And yet we know that the opposite is true, that Jerusalem is a place of conflict.  While these interfaith conflicts did not exist in Jerusalem in Jesus’ day, Jerusalem was a place of both religious awe and political power – when Solomon built his temple, he made very sure to build his home nearby.  Jerusalem was a seat of institutional power – and institutions inevitably work to protect and perpetuate themselves, often betraying their best ideals and purposes.   In our day we can think of the lengths that the Vatican and other centers of religious power have gone to in defending against claims from those abused by these institutions.  And when the lawyers get involved, churches can behave in ways that are just as cut-throat as any corporation, and all pretense of care is left behind.  When an institution feels threatened, it will do whatever it takes, however ugly, to eliminate the threat.  And Jesus knew the powers that be in Jerusalem, political and religious, would see him as a threat.
Remember that Jesus had just compared Herod to a fox.  While a fox is hardly a terrifying threat to us, it can still be plenty dangerous to weaker, more vulnerable animals…..we use the phrase “the fox guiarding the hen house” to describe a situation in which a person charged with protecting others has personal motivation to harm them instead.  And so it is at this point that Jesus describes his intentions with a surprising feminine image.  Jesus described Herod as a fox, and now he describes himself as - yep -  a mother hen.
It’s a surprising image.   I’ve read that there’s a church on the outskirts of Jerusalem with a stained glass window depicting a hen with outstretched wings[1] – but that’s a very rare stained glass image.  The “mother hen” image isn’t used in our hymns all that often – I’m not aware of any hymn that goes “What a hen we have in Jesus.”. 
But maybe the “hen” image adds to our understanding of Jesus, and of God’s protection.  A hen isn’t the most intimidating of animals – it’s not very big, not very fast, not equipped with the most threatening of defenses, just a beak and claws.  But if her chicks are faced with danger, a hen will put herself between danger and her chicks, perhaps putting them under her and puffing her feathers up to make her look bigger and more threatening than she really is.  A mother hen will put herself between her brood and danger, and danger includes predatory animals, and even fire.  There are stories in which part of a barn has caught fire, and after the fire is extinguished, the farmer finds the dead, charred body of a hen – and live chicks underneath the hen’s body.
I think we’d prefer a more fearsome animal as an image of God’s protection. For example, we like the image of the Lion of Judah on the throne.   But Jesus uses images of shepherds laying down their lives for the sheep and hens putting their body between danger and their chicks, putting their bodies on the line and perhaps dying to save their brood, rather than any images of great conquest.  In Revelation chapters 4 and 5, while it is the Lion of the Tribe of Judah who is proclaimed worthy to open the scroll with seven seals, the focus shifts immediately to the Lamb in the center of the throne, the lamb who was slain, who is to shepherd those who have attained eternal life. 
Jesus lamented over Jerusalem, which was thought to be the location of God’s presence.  While many faithful experienced God’s presence there, also present in Jerusalem was political power concealed beneath a veneer of religion, often used in to oppress rather than uplift the faithful – and it is this politicized corruption of faith that Jesus lamented.  Later in Luke’s gospel, as Jesus enters Jerusalem, he again laments and even weeps over the city, saying, “If you, even you, had only known on this day the things that make for peace!—but now they are hidden from your eyes.”  
Those in power in Jerusalem saw themselves as being wily foxes as they schemed and plotted to deal with the very real threats to their power that came from Rome – but Jesus saw them as chicks lost in a storm, separated from their mother and refusing mother’s protection, so confused and desperate that they trusted in foxes like Herod to guard their hen-house.  One might wonder what Jesus would think of our centers of power.  Would he weep and lament over Washington and Wall Street and other centers of power who when convenient may hold to a form of godliness in order to deceive the masses, but deny its power (2 Timothy 3:5) by putting their real trust in military and economic force.
Jesus is still the good shepherd who lays down his life for the sheep, the Lamb who was slain who is to shepherd his people, and – yes – a mother hen trying, often without success, to gather us, the chicks, under wings of protection.  Others promise us protection and safety, but may well turn out to be foxes seeking to guard hen houses.  The security they offer is false and fleeting.  It is with Jesus that we will find safety. Indeed, what a Hen we have in Jesus, a Hen with wings outstretched to shelter us.  We are called to gather with Jesus, and to invite others to gather with us.  May we at Emanuel church nestle under the wings of our great Mother Hen, and invite others to join us in safety. Amen.



[1] https://blog.diocesewma.org/2013/02/21/the-mother-hen-image-of-jesus-is-for-our-time/