Sunday, March 24, 2019

Gathered

Genesis 15:1-12, 17-18
Psalm 27
Philippians 3:17–4:1
Luke 13:31-35



Today our Scripture readings seem to have a theme of trusting in God’s care and protection.  Aging Abram, assuming he would die childless, is told by God that God would make a great nation of him.  And Jesus, apprised of a threat from Herod, basically compares himself to a mother hen, frustrated that her chicks are running from her instead of gathering under her. 
Jesus is on his way to Jerusalem.  Just before today’s reading, he had healed a bent-over woman – and as often happened with Jesus, instead of being praised for the healing, he was condemned because he healed the woman in the wrong place at the wrong time – that is to say, in a synagogue on the Sabbath.  He told several parables about the reign of God, comparing it to a mustard seed, a tiny seed from which can grow a great shrub, and yeast, which though tiny can  with water transform flour into dough for bread.  He also said that the entrance to the kingdom is narrow, and that many who are first in this life will be last in the life to come, and many who are now last will be first.  And at this teaching moment, some Pharisees come to warn Jesus that Herod is on the hunt for him.
We may wonder about the motivations of these Pharisees.  Are they trying to protect Jesus, or to scare him off?  Or maybe both?  Was their warning an attempt to uphold or to undermine Herod’s authority?  Jesus’ relationship with the Pharisees is complicated.  There were similarities between Jesus and the Pharisees, in that both Jesus and the Pharisees thought that faith wasn’t just about weekly religious observance, but that it was important to practice faith every day in every part of one’s life.  But, as the Gospels portray the differences, the Pharisees were concerned about maintaining purity by upholding the ceremonial law, including guidelines on what food was acceptable, what clothing was acceptable, what choices of friends were acceptable, etc..  Jesus was not overly concerned with the finer points of the ceremonial law – he often hung out with those the Pharisees considered the scum of the earth - and more concerned about love of neighbor, and was willing to bend or even break the purity guidelines of the time in order to help people.  
Now, as we read the Gospels, we should keep in mind that their portrayals of the Pharisees isn’t by any means neutral or impartial – the Gospels were intentionally written to make Jesus look good, and in so doing sometimes make the Pharisees look not so good – and at the time they were written, decades after Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, the disciples of Jesus were being pushed out of the mainstream Judaism of the time, and it was like an ugly divorce, with accusations and counter-accusations being hurled on all sides.  We should remember that Jesus, his disciples, along with the Pharisees and the Sadducees, were all Jews…they just had differing visions on how to live out their Judaism.  We certainly shouldn’t view modern-day Jewish people as acting anything like the stereotypical Pharisees of the gospels.  I say all this because we live in a time where religious stereotyping and bigotry leads to violence, as at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh several months ago, and now this weekend at against Muslims at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand.  We should always be working to improve dialogue and understanding between faiths, and not to spread mistrust.  But, as I said, the Gospels portray Jesus’ relationship with the Pharisees as complicated, with some Pharisees condemning Jesus, some being at least willing to engage in dialogue with Jesus, and some at least partially agreeing with Jesus.  Maybe the Pharisees could be described as “frenemies”.   Right after today’s reading, Jesus is invited to dinner by a Pharisee…..but that’s a story for another time.
In any case, the Pharisees warn Jesus that Herod is out to get him.  Now, Herod is a dangerous, paranoid man, a real piece of work.  He not only had John the Baptist executed, he had his own son executed when he thought his son was a threat.  Jesus, however, seems distinctly unimpressed, and starts talking trash about Herod.  “Go tell that fox for me, “Listen, I am casting out demons and performing cures today and tomorrow, and on the third day I finish my work.”  Jesus calls Herod a fox – hardly the fearsome image of a roaring lion that Herod would likely have chosen for himself.  We might think of it as Jesus asking the Pharisees to tell Herod, “You don’t scare me.  I’m going to keep doing what I’m doing, and I’ll take whatever time is needed, and I’ll leave the area on my own schedule.  You’re not going to stampede me and my disciples out of town before I’m done.”  But then Jesus refers to his continuing journey toward Jerusalem with bitter irony, because Jesus knows what awaits him in Jerusalem.  “Yet today, tomorrow, and the next day I must be on my way, because it is impossible for a prophet to be killed outside of Jerusalem.' Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it!”
Jerusalem still occupies a paradoxical role.  The city holds a prominent place in three great faiths – Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.   Given that place of honor, you would think that Jerusalem would be the place where the best of these faiths would be evident, and that unconditional love and peace would prevail there.  And yet we know that the opposite is true, that Jerusalem is a place of conflict.  While these interfaith conflicts did not exist in Jerusalem in Jesus’ day, Jerusalem was a place of both religious awe and political power – when Solomon built his temple, he made very sure to build his home nearby.  Jerusalem was a seat of institutional power – and institutions inevitably work to protect and perpetuate themselves, often betraying their best ideals and purposes.   In our day we can think of the lengths that the Vatican and other centers of religious power have gone to in defending against claims from those abused by these institutions.  And when the lawyers get involved, churches can behave in ways that are just as cut-throat as any corporation, and all pretense of care is left behind.  When an institution feels threatened, it will do whatever it takes, however ugly, to eliminate the threat.  And Jesus knew the powers that be in Jerusalem, political and religious, would see him as a threat.
Remember that Jesus had just compared Herod to a fox.  While a fox is hardly a terrifying threat to us, it can still be plenty dangerous to weaker, more vulnerable animals…..we use the phrase “the fox guiarding the hen house” to describe a situation in which a person charged with protecting others has personal motivation to harm them instead.  And so it is at this point that Jesus describes his intentions with a surprising feminine image.  Jesus described Herod as a fox, and now he describes himself as - yep -  a mother hen.
It’s a surprising image.   I’ve read that there’s a church on the outskirts of Jerusalem with a stained glass window depicting a hen with outstretched wings[1] – but that’s a very rare stained glass image.  The “mother hen” image isn’t used in our hymns all that often – I’m not aware of any hymn that goes “What a hen we have in Jesus.”. 
But maybe the “hen” image adds to our understanding of Jesus, and of God’s protection.  A hen isn’t the most intimidating of animals – it’s not very big, not very fast, not equipped with the most threatening of defenses, just a beak and claws.  But if her chicks are faced with danger, a hen will put herself between danger and her chicks, perhaps putting them under her and puffing her feathers up to make her look bigger and more threatening than she really is.  A mother hen will put herself between her brood and danger, and danger includes predatory animals, and even fire.  There are stories in which part of a barn has caught fire, and after the fire is extinguished, the farmer finds the dead, charred body of a hen – and live chicks underneath the hen’s body.
I think we’d prefer a more fearsome animal as an image of God’s protection. For example, we like the image of the Lion of Judah on the throne.   But Jesus uses images of shepherds laying down their lives for the sheep and hens putting their body between danger and their chicks, putting their bodies on the line and perhaps dying to save their brood, rather than any images of great conquest.  In Revelation chapters 4 and 5, while it is the Lion of the Tribe of Judah who is proclaimed worthy to open the scroll with seven seals, the focus shifts immediately to the Lamb in the center of the throne, the lamb who was slain, who is to shepherd those who have attained eternal life. 
Jesus lamented over Jerusalem, which was thought to be the location of God’s presence.  While many faithful experienced God’s presence there, also present in Jerusalem was political power concealed beneath a veneer of religion, often used in to oppress rather than uplift the faithful – and it is this politicized corruption of faith that Jesus lamented.  Later in Luke’s gospel, as Jesus enters Jerusalem, he again laments and even weeps over the city, saying, “If you, even you, had only known on this day the things that make for peace!—but now they are hidden from your eyes.”  
Those in power in Jerusalem saw themselves as being wily foxes as they schemed and plotted to deal with the very real threats to their power that came from Rome – but Jesus saw them as chicks lost in a storm, separated from their mother and refusing mother’s protection, so confused and desperate that they trusted in foxes like Herod to guard their hen-house.  One might wonder what Jesus would think of our centers of power.  Would he weep and lament over Washington and Wall Street and other centers of power who when convenient may hold to a form of godliness in order to deceive the masses, but deny its power (2 Timothy 3:5) by putting their real trust in military and economic force.
Jesus is still the good shepherd who lays down his life for the sheep, the Lamb who was slain who is to shepherd his people, and – yes – a mother hen trying, often without success, to gather us, the chicks, under wings of protection.  Others promise us protection and safety, but may well turn out to be foxes seeking to guard hen houses.  The security they offer is false and fleeting.  It is with Jesus that we will find safety. Indeed, what a Hen we have in Jesus, a Hen with wings outstretched to shelter us.  We are called to gather with Jesus, and to invite others to gather with us.  May we at Emanuel church nestle under the wings of our great Mother Hen, and invite others to join us in safety. Amen.



[1] https://blog.diocesewma.org/2013/02/21/the-mother-hen-image-of-jesus-is-for-our-time/

No comments:

Post a Comment