Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Love (4th Sunday in Advent)



Scripture:        Isaiah 7:10-16, Psalm 80:1-7, 17-19
Romans 1:1-7, Matthew 1:18-25




This Sunday, along with the first three Advent candles of hope, peace, and joy, we light the fourth Advent candle of love.  And at this time of year, the word “love” brings us feelings of warm fuzzies – taking the little ones to see Santa at the Rec Center or the mall, going with a loved one to the Christmas Village downtown, looking at the stalls with their exotic wares, some hand-crafted, perhaps walking around downtown Philly or Old City or any number of Philadelphia neighborhoods to see the Christmas lights.  This year, my former congregation, Old First, has a Christmas creche without live animals.  Two years ago, there was chaos when Stormy the Cow wandered away from Old First’s Christmas creche – twice – the first time ending up on I95 and the second time in a parking garage.  Two years later, KYW 1060 still mentions the cow on I95 in their ads for their “traffic on the twos” segments.  After that fiasco, Old First ended their 40-year live animal creche tradition – though there will be a live Mary and Joseph and baby Jesus on Christmas Eve.  It’s a time for eggnog – my friend Clinton called me midweek from the Rockview State Correctional Institute to wish me a Merry Christmas and told me to drink some eggnog for him, since he won’t be having any on the inside.  As I tell people sometimes, I have friends in high places, friends in low places, and friends in strange places.  And so while I’m not a big eggnog drinker, perhaps I’ll raise a cup of eggnog for my friend Clinton.
As we light the fourth Advent candle, this Sunday we read Matthew’s rather brief account of the birth of Jesus, which focused on Joseph.   Last week we talked about Mary, but today, Joseph gets his moment in the spotlight.   In our Gospel reading, Joseph models the costly love that God gives us, and that God asks from us for others.
Matthew’s Gospel begins with a genealogy – Joseph’s genealogy, to be exact.  And for us, genealogies are booooooooh – riiiiing.  So and so begat so and so begat so and so…….zzzzzzzzzzzz.  All those old names – who could possibly remember them all, let alone care about them.  But for people in Biblical times, your genealogy told you where you came from and who you were….sort of like people in our time who trace their genealogies – a few of whom come my way to see if I can tell them anything about their ancestors in our cemetery – or who send saliva samples to 23andme to have their DNA traced.  Joseph’s genealogy has famous names – Abraham, the patriarch of the Jewish people, of course, and also the royal blood of Kings David and Solomon.   In the genealogy, Matthew also mentions four women, four female ancestors of King David – very unusual in a genealogy – Tamar, who pretended to be a prostitute to bear children to Judah, Rahab, who was a prostitute and who gave shelter to Israelite spies scouting the city of Jericho – and was married into the Davidic line, Ruth the Moabite widow who married King David’s great-grandfather Boaz, and Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah whom David took as his wife and who gave birth to Solomon.   All four of these women acted unconventionally, even scandalously, in continuing King David’s line.  By prefacing Joseph’s story with this genealogy, with its hints of scandal, Matthew seems to be preparing his readers for the unconventional and even scandalous story of Mary and Joseph and the child Jesus.
 And then we come to today’s Gospel reading where we meet Mary and Joseph. In the customs of the time, with the guidance of their parents, the bride and groom would enter a marriage contract. When the contract was signed, on paper, they were married, but the marriage would not have been consummated until some time later, perhaps years later. The groom would come to claim his bride, the marriage would be consummated, and a feast would ensue.  And in that culture, the bride’s virginity prior to the consummation of the marriage was of paramount importance.  In our Gospel reading, Mary and Joseph would have signed a marriage contract, but the marriage would not have been consummated.  We learn that Joseph’s fiancĂ© Mary is pregnant, and while Joseph initially did not know the child is from the Holy Spirit, he did know one thing: the kid wasn’t his. While we’re told that Joseph is a decent man – a stand-up guy – in terms of going ahead with the wedding, this baby was a deal-breaker. As Joseph initially understood his situation, he had two options, both bad. He could make a stink, create a public scandal, even have Mary stoned to death for adultery, if he wanted to push that option to its limit. Or he could quietly break things off with Mary… if anyone asked why, he could just tell them, “things just didn’t work out between us.”   The marriage contract would be annulled, and that would leave Joseph free to go on with his life and marry someone else – though Mary as an unwed mother would be in a very precarious position at best, as she would not be seen as a desirable marriage partner, and a woman alone would likely live in poverty. The Holy Spirit gave Joseph another option: marry Mary and raise her child as his own. And this is the option Joseph chose.
It was a life-giving option for Mary and for Jesus, but a costly option for Joseph. He would be raising a child not his own, not even getting to choose the child’s name.  Luke’s gospel then tells us of his journey to Bethlehem, in response to the decree of Caesar Augustus for a census and taxation, with his very pregnant wife, and Mary’s giving birth in the stable because there was no room in the inn.  Matthew’s gospel then tells us about Joseph’s continued costly love that left him and Mary and the child in Egypt for a time as refugees from the murderous intentions of Herod.   We remember the story of Jesus in the Temple with the elders, when Mary and Joseph had to return to Jerusalem to hunt high and low for Jesus.  Even after he was back home, his neighbors would whisper behind his back about Jesus’ parentage from that day forward…..and we  hear no more of Joseph after Jesus began his ministry.   Joseph’s obedience to God and love for Mary and the baby imposed one burden after another on Joseph.  And Joseph had no way to know who Jesus would become or how important it was that he care for Jesus.  No choirs were singing carols for Joseph as he provided for Mary and the child.  And yet, Joseph was faithful.  Indeed, such was the love Joseph showered on Jesus, that Jesus taught his followers to look on God as “Father”.

Dorothy Day, founder of the Catholic Worker movement, often quoted Dostoyevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov in saying that “Love in action is a harsh and dreadful thing compared to love in dreams.” Dorothy Day’s words reflect her experience as she acted in love toward New York City’s homeless and helpless.  Joseph’s love for Jesus brought harshness and dread into Joseph’s life.  It was a fully-committed love – at every turn, despite every burden and obstacle, Joseph was all in on providing and protecting Mary and the child.  We were told early in Matthew’s gospel that Joseph was a stand-up guy, and Joseph stood up for Mary and the child at every turn.

Dorothy Day said that “Love in action is a harsh and dreadful thing compared to love in dreams.”  Mary’s story in Luke’s gospel may leave us with an example of faithfulness that’s hard to connect to – but I think we can connect to Joseph’s story.  Being committed in our relationships, loving when it’s difficult, being there for others when we’d prefer to be anywhere else.  Think of the things we do for those we love, our spouse and our children - changing diapers, cleaning up vomit, visiting in the hospital, watching our loved ones cry themselves dry and scream themselves hoarse, and still being there for them - and being brave in standing up for them and protecting them from harm.  None of these things, none of these things are fun or enjoyable – but we do them from love.  In doing these things, we walk in the path of Joseph, whose example shaped Jesus’ view of God as Father.  And beyond our own family circle, there’s the wider circle of the church, the family of God’s people, the family of faith, and beyond that our neighbors, those others for whom Christ also died.  The challenge of discipleship is taking those things we do for our family, and being willing to do the same for strangers.  Obeying God’s command to love neighbor as self will have us talking to people we’d prefer to ignore, going places we’d prefer to avoid, doing things that are difficult if not painful…and thanking God for the privilege to be God’s hands and feet.

Hope, peace, joy, and love – these are the Advent candles we light.  These are the candles that light our path to the manger, as we prepare for the coming of Christ in our hearts, our lives, our world.

I’ll close these words from African American pastor, theologian, and mystic Howard Thurman.
I will light candles this Christmas,
Candles of joy despite all the sadness,
Candles of hope where despair keeps watch,
Candles of courage for fears ever present,
Candles of peace for tempest-tossed days,
Candles of grace to ease heavy burdens,
Candles of love to inspire all my living,
Candles that will burn all year long.

Amen.

 

Joy (Sermon for Gaudete Sunday)


Scripture:       Isaiah 35:1-10,           Luke 1:46-55
James 5:7-10              Matthew 11:2-11




Today, the 3rd Sunday in Advent, is called Gaudete Sunday.  Gaudete is a Latin word meaning ”Rejoice!”, and so on the 3rd Sunday in Advent, we are reminded to rejoice. As part of that rejoicing, we light, along with the two purple candles signifying penitence, the pink candle signifying joy. 
What is joy?  What does it mean to rejoice?  Is joy the same as happiness?  Recently, I read of a country named Bhutan – a small, landlocked country, roughly the size of Switzerland, population about 755,000, bordered by China, India, and Tibet.  There are many ways to measure and compare nations.  Gross national product is a common metric, by which the success of a government is measured on the basis of the value of the goods produced and services provided by a country in a year, plus income from foreign investments.  Gross domestic product is similar, except it excludes income from foreign investments.  In 1972, the 4th king of Bhutan, one Jigme Singye Wangchuck, declared “gross national happiness is more important that gross domestic product”.  This statement recognized that the success of a nation cannot be reduced to dollar signs, that development should take a wholistic approach and factor in non-economic measures.  The four pillars of Gross National Happiness are (1) sustainable and equitable socio-economic development, (2) environmental conservation, (3) preservation and promotion of culture, and (4) good governance.  The nine domains of GNH are psychological well-being, health, time use, education, cultural diversity and resilience, good governance, community vitality, ecological diversity and resilience, and living standards.  The population fills out detailed surveys that attempt to measure how the populace measures up against these metrics and how happy they are, even asking subjects to indicate how often they prayed each day, as one measure of the karma they generated. Based on their responses, people are classed as unhappy, narrowly happy, extensively happy, and deeply happy.   In the first years of implementation, the surveys used to take hours to complete, but the government soon learned that filling out lengthy surveys didn’t make the people happy – in fact, it detracted from gross national happiness, and so they’ve simplified the surveys somewhat – though the people are still asked about their frequency of prayer and other religious practices.[1]
As I read about the distinction between happiness and joy, it would seem that happiness is based in circumstances. For example, being treated to a dinner at a nice restaurant may make you feel happy, while being stuck in traffic on the way to the restaurant may make you feel unhappy.  So, depending on your circumstances and your disposition, you could swing between happiness and unhappiness several times a day.  In fact, according to the country of Bhutan, you need four pillars and nine domains of circumstances in order to experience happiness.  Joy, by contrast, seems to be more internally based, more of an inward quality, less subject to circumstances.  It may be significant that Paul’s letter to the Galatians lists joy as one of the fruits of the Spirit, while happiness is not.  So while joy and happiness may look and feel similar, they come from different places.
Our texts this morning give us a variety of lenses through which to understand joy.  Our text from Isaiah, similar to the other texts from Isaiah that we’ve read during Advent, once again gives us a vision of God’s reign. Repeatedly throughout the first 39 chapters of Isaiah, the prophet again and condemned his people for their unfaithfulness. But interspersed with these condemnations, he also provided an alternative vision, in effect saying, “Our people don’t have to continue on their current doomed course. If you repent, here’s how wonderful your lives will be. “ And let’s revisit part of Isaiah’s vision: 
Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf unstopped; then the lame shall leap like a deer, and the tongue of the speechless sing for joy. Water will gush forth in the wilderness and streams in the desert. (Isaiah 35:5-6)
As we read this verse, this may remind us of Jesus’ miracles – these are among the healings that Jesus did.   And I’ve often wondered why those in power found Jesus to be such a threat.  After all, he went about doing good, healing people, teaching people to care for one another.  Those are bad things?  Who could object to any of this?  But as we read from Isaiah and consider Jesus’ ministry, we can see that Jesus’ miracles had a significance beyond themselves. Beyond the immediate healings of the ill, Jesus’ miracles pointed to this passage and to the reign of God that Jesus both proclaimed and embodied – the reign of God which didn’t include the reign of Caesar, and didn’t include the religious leaders who had sold out to Caesar.  These healings, these miracles, were of course a blessing to those who benefitted directly – but they were at the same time subversive to the powers that were, the powers that were who were powerless to replicate what Jesus did.  And so the representatives of Caesar, political and religious, those who benefitted from the power of Caesar, felt threatened.    And so we even as we experience the joy of the Lord, we need to recognize that not everyone may share in our joy, that some may even feel threatened that our joy comes from a different place and is not dependent on their whims.
Together, we read responsively Mary’s Magnificat, Mary’s great hymn to the liberating power of God. Given that Mary was “with child” – a child not fathered by her fiancĂ© Joseph, a child who would be whispered about all the days of Mary’s life – she had any number of reasons to be anxious about the present and fearful for her future. “Blessed” would be the very last word those neighbors with their salacious whispers would use to describe Mary.   And yet Mary could sing, “My soul rejoices in God my Savior.”   Mary knew that as God provided her with a son, God would also provide a way forward.   Like Hannah before her, who similarly rejoiced as she dedicated her son Samuel to God’s service (I Samuel 2), Mary knew that her son’s life would be a game changer, that his life would be a cause of rejoicing for the poor and humble, but a threat to the proud and powerful.  Mary’s faith in God’s provision and protection brought her a joy that, through the words of the Magnificat, has echoed down the centuries for some two thousand years. 
In our reading from Matthew’s Gospel, John the Baptist is having second thoughts. Having confidently prepared the way for Jesus, John was arrested for having condemned Herod’s marriage to the wife of his brother Philip. While in prison, John heard accounts of Jesus’ ministry – and John wasn’t sure what to make of what he heard.   John preached that the one to come would separate the wheat from the chaff and burn the chaff with unquenchable fire.  Jesus’ welcome of the outcasts was so different from John’s message of “turn or burn”.   So John sent messengers to ask Jesus, “Are you the One, or are we to wait for another?”  Perhaps John’s unstated message to Jesus was something like, “OK, Jesus, when are you going to get busy with the fire and start burning away the chaff, start getting rid of all the bad people?”  Jesus reassured John with words that reminded him of our reading from Isaiah, saying "Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the poor have good news brought to them.”  And Jesus told the John’s emissaries to ask John to keep an open mind, saying  “And blessed is anyone who takes no offense at me.”  John’s limited perspective had for a time replaced his faith, hope, and joy with doubt,  but Jesus’ words reconnected John to the deepest meaning of John’s own proclamation – restoration, not damnation - and gave him cause for joy even in prison.
Happiness is dependent on circumstance and can come and go, but joy does not depend on circumstances.  At the end of his ministry, at his last supper with the disciples, Jesus told them, “Very truly, I tell you, you will weep and mourn, but the world will rejoice; you will have pain, but your pain will turn into joy.  When a woman is in labor, she has pain, because her hour has come. But when her child is born, she no longer remembers the anguish because of the joy of having brought a human being into the world.  So you have pain now; but I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your joy from you.” (John 16:20-22)
The German mystic Meister Eckert had an interesting take on this idea of labor and birth, of pain turning into joy.  Eckert wrote:
  We are all meant to be mothers of God. What good is it to me if this eternal birth of the divine Son takes place unceasingly, but does not take place within myself? And, what good is it to me if Mary is full of grace if I am not also full of grace? What good is it to me for the Creator to give birth to his Son if I do not also give birth to him in my time and my culture? This, then, is the fullness of time: When the Son of Man is begotten in us.”[2]
The idea of giving birth to God in ourselves sounds a bit mind-blowing, dangerous, even heretical.  And yet, our last hymn is the familiar carol “O Little Town of Bethlehem”, the last verse of which contains these words:

“O Holy Child of Bethlehem, descend to us we pray.
Cast our our sin, and enter in: be born in us today.” (E&R #108)

May the joy of the Lord be born in us, live in us, grow in us, until our lives become windows through which the joy and light of Christ become visible to all around us.  Amen.


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_National_Happiness, https://ophi.org.uk/policy/national-policy/gross-national-happiness-index/
[2] http://www.catholicstoreroom.com/category/quotes/quote-author/meister-eckhart-1260-1328/